Affiliation:
1. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Robotisches Zentrum, St. Georg Klinikum Eisenach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Eisenach, Germany
2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
3. Klinik für Geriatrie und Palliativmedizin, Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Study design Because of current demographic developments, a hypothesis was proposed whereby older female patients aged > 65 years can be safely operated using minimally invasive,
robotic-assisted surgery, despite having more preoperative comorbidities. A comparative cohort study was designed to compare the age group ≥ 65 years (older age group, OAG) with the age
group < 65 years (younger age group, YAG) after robotic-assisted gynecological surgery (RAS) in two German centers.
Patients and methods Consecutive RAS procedures performed between 2016 and 2021 at the Women’s University Hospital of Jena and the Robotic Center Eisenach to treat benign or
oncological indications were included in the study. The age groups were compared according to their preoperative comorbidities (ASA, Charlson comorbidity index [CCI], cumulative illness
rating scale – geriatric version [CIRS-G]) and perioperative parameters such as Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications. Analysis was performed using Welch’s
t-test, chi2 test, and Fisher’s exact test.
Results A total of 242 datasets were identified, of which 63 (73 ± 5 years) were OAG and 179 were YAG (48 ± 10 years). Patient characteristics and the percentage of benign or
oncological indications did not differ between the two age groups. Comorbidity scores and the percentage of obese patients were higher in the OAG group: CCI (2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 1.5 ± 1.3;
p < 0.001), CIRS-G (9.7 ± 3.9 vs. 5.4 ± 2.9; p < 0.001), ASA class II/III (91.8% vs. 74.1%; p = 0.004), obesity (54.1% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.030). There was no difference between age
groups, even grouped for benign or oncological indications, with regard to perioperative parameters such as duration of surgery (p = 0.088; p = 0.368), length of hospital stay (p = 0.786;
p = 0.814), decrease in Hb levels (p = 0.811; p = 0.058), conversion rate (p = 1.000; p = 1.000) and CD complications (p = 0.433; p = 0.745).
Conclusion Although preoperative comorbidity was higher in the group of older female patients, no differences were found between age groups with regard to perioperative outcomes
following robotic-assisted gynecological surgery. Patient age is not a contraindication for robotic gynecological surgery.
Subject
Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献