Affiliation:
1. Division of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
3. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
Abstract
AbstractBackground and study aims In 2015, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Task Force on Quality in Endoscopy deemed adenoma detection rate (ADR) the most important quality measure for colonoscopy. There has been much interest in factors that can increase ADR. To date, however, few studies have looked at what intra-procedural endoscopist practices are associated with improving ADR. We conducted a retrospective review of colonoscopy videos to evaluate intra-procedural practices that could be associated with ADR.Methods Videos were recorded of colonoscopies performed between September and December 2017 at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Colonoscopies for screening and surveillance were included for video review. Factors assessed included withdrawal time, intra-procedural cleaning, inspection technique, and other variables (colon distention, removal of equivocal/hyperplastic polyps). A series of multiple regression analyses was conducted on variables of interest before running a final model of significant predictors.Results A total of 130 videos were reviewed from nine endoscopists whose ADRs ranged between 37.5 % and 73.7 %. The final regression model was significant (F = 15.35, df = 2, P = 0.0044), R2 = 0.8365) with close inspection of behind folds and quality of cecal inspection being the factors highly correlated with predicting ADR. Withdrawal and inspection times, colonic wall distention, removal of equivocal/hyperplastic polyps, quality of rectal inspection, suctioning, and washing were factors moderately correlated with predicting ADR.Conclusions We found that behind-fold inspection and a meticulous cecal inspection technique were predictive of a high ADR.
Subject
Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference35 articles.
1. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death;D A Corley;N Engl J Med,2014
2. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy;R L Barclay;N Engl J Med,2006
3. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment;B F Overholt;J Clin Gastroenterol,2010
4. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England;T J Lee;Endoscopy,2013
5. Quality indicators for colonoscopy;D K Rex;Am J Gastroenterol,2006
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献