Derivation and Validation of a Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care

Author:

Dentali Francesco1,Fontanella Andrea2,Cohen Alexander T.3,Simonetti Monica4,Parretti Luca5,Marconi Ettore4,Parretti Damiano6,Gussoni Gualberto7,Campanini Mauro8,Agnelli Giancarlo9,Cricelli Claudio6,Lapi Francesco4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Luino, ASST-Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital “Buon Consiglio-Fatebenefratelli,” Naples, Italy

3. Department of Haematological Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

4. Health Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy

5. Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

6. Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy

7. Clinical Research Department, FADOI Foundation, Milan, Italy

8. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital “Maggiore della Carità,” Novara, Italy

9. Department of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine-Stroke Unit, Hospital “S. Maria della Misericordia,” University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background Most episodes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in primary care. To date, no score potentially able to identify those patients who may deserve an antithrombotic prophylaxis has been developed. Aim The objective of this study is to develop and validate a prediction model for VTE in primary care. Methods Using the Health Search Database, we identified a cohort of 1,359,880 adult patients between 2002 and 2013. The date of the first General Practitioner's (GP) visit was the cohort entry date. All VTE cases (index date) observed up to December 2014 were identified. The cohort was randomly divided in a development and a validation cohort. According to nested case-cohort analysis, up to five controls were matched to their respective cases on month and year of cohort entry and duration of follow-up.The score was evaluated according to explained variance (pseudo R2) as a performance measure, ratio of predicted to observed cases as model calibration and area under the curve (AUC) as discrimination measure. Results The score was able to explain 27.9% of the variation for VTE occurrence. The calibration measure revealed a margin of error lower than 10% in 70% of the population. In terms of discrimination, AUC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.82–0.83). Results of sensitivity analyses substantially confirmed these findings. Conclusion The present score demonstrated a very good accuracy in predicting the risk of VTE in primary care. This score may be therefore implemented in clinical practice so aiding GPs in making decision on patients potentially at risk of VTE.

Funder

AlfaSigma

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3