Neonatal Morbidity of Monoamniotic Twin Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author:

Buca Danilo1,Di Mascio Daniele2ORCID,Khalil Asma34,Acharya Ganesh56,Van Mieghem Tim7,Hack Karien8,Murata Masaharu9,Anselem Olivia10,D'Amico Alice1,Muzii Ludovico2,Liberati Marco1,Nappi Luigi11,D'Antonio Francesco11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy

2. Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

3. Fetal Medicine Unit, Saint George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

4. Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom

5. Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

6. Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway and University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn, The Netherlands

9. Center for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

10. Maternité Port-Royal, Groupe Hospitalier Cochin-Broca-Hôtel-Dieu, Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France

11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine and Cardiology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed to report the incidence of neonatal morbidity in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies according to gestational age at birth and type of management adopted (inpatient or outpatient). Study Design Medline and Embase databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were nonanomalous MCMA twins. The primary outcome was a composite score of neonatal morbidity, defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following outcomes: respiratory morbidity, overall neurological morbidity, severe neurological morbidity, and infectious morbidity, necrotizing enterocolitis at different gestational age windows (24–30, 31–32, 33–34, and 35–36 weeks). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Subanalysis according to the type of surveillance strategy (inpatient compared with outpatient) was also performed. Random effect meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Results A total of 14 studies including 685 MCMA twin pregnancies without fetal anomalies were included. At 24 to 30, 31 to 32, 33 to 34, and 35 to 36 weeks of gestation, the rate of composite morbidity was 75.4, 65.5, 37.6, and 18.5%, respectively, the rate of respiratory morbidity was 74.2, 59.1, 35.5, and 12.2%, respectively, while overall neurological morbidity occurred in 15.3, 10.2, 4.3, and 0% of the cases, respectively. Infectious morbidity complicated 13, 4.2, 3.1, and 0% of newborns while 92.1, 81.6, 58.7, and 0% of cases required admission to NICU. Morbidity in pregnancies delivered between 35 and 36 weeks of gestation was affected by the very small sample size of cases included. When comparing the occurrence of overall morbidity according to the type of management (inpatient or outpatient), there was no difference between the two surveillance strategies (p = 0.114). Conclusion MCMA pregnancies are at high risk of composite neonatal morbidity, mainly respiratory morbidity that gradually decreases with increasing gestational age at delivery with a significant reduction for pregnancies delivered between 33 and 34 weeks. We found no difference in the occurrence of neonatal morbidity between pregnancies managed as inpatient or outpatient. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Monochorionic Monoamniotic Twin Pregnancy: Shared but Not Equal;NeoReviews;2024-03-01

2. Long-term follow-up of complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: Focus on neurodevelopment;Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology;2022-11

3. Discordance in twins: Association versus prediction;Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology;2022-11

4. Screening and diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancy;Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology;2022-11

5. Perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies during a 10-year period: a single center, descriptive study;Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics;2022-03-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3