Dental Implants Surface in vitro Decontamination Protocols

Author:

Batalha Vanessa Coelho1,Bueno Raquel Abreu1,Fronchetti Junior Edemar1,Mariano José Ricardo2,Santin Gabriela Cristina3,Freitas Karina Maria Salvatore4ORCID,Ortiz Mariana Aparecida Lopes5,Salmeron Samira1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Ingá University Center–Uningá, Maringá, Brazil

2. Department of Implant Dentistry, Unieuro University Center, Brasília, Brazil

3. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ingá University Center–Uningá, Maringá, Brazil

4. Department of Orthodontics, Ingá University Center–Uningá, Maringá, Brazil

5. Department of Microbiology, Ingá University Center–Uningá, Maringá, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Objective The number of patients rehabilitated with dental implants has contributed to increased incidence of peri-implant diseases. Due to complex and difficult treatment, peri-implantitis is a challenge and an efficient clinical protocol is not yet established. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two protocols for in vitro decontamination of dental implants surface. Materials and Methods Twenty titanium implants (BioHE-Bioconect) were used. Implants were divided into five groups (n = 4). NC group (negative control): sterile implants; PC group (positive control): biofilm contaminated implants; S group: biofilm contaminated implants, brushed with sterile saline; SB group: biofilm contaminated implants, brushed with sterile saline and treated with air-powder abrasive system with sodium bicarbonate (1 minute); and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) group: biofilm contaminated implants, brushed with sterile saline and treated with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (red laser + toluidine blue O). The implants were contaminated in vitro with subgingival biofilm and distributed in groups PC, S, SB, and aPDT. Each group received the respective decontamination treatment, except groups NC and PC. Then, all implants were placed in tubes containing culture medium for later sowing and counting of colony-forming units (CFUs). Statistical Analysis One-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests were performed, at 5% significance level. Results Significantly fewer CFUs were observed in the aPDT group (19.38 × 105) when compared with groups SB (26.88 × 105), S (47.75 × 105), and PC (59.88 × 105) (p < 0.01). Both the aPDT and SB groups were statistically different from the NC group (p < 0.01). Conclusion Proposed protocols, using air-powder abrasive system with sodium bicarbonate and aPDT, showed to be efficacious in the decontamination of dental implants surface in vitro.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference36 articles.

1. Implant therapy: 40 years of experience;M Quirynen;Periodontol 2000,2014

2. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications;B E Pjetursson;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2014

3. Epidemiology and risk factors of peri-implantitis: a systematic review;H Dreyer;J Periodontal Res,2018

4. Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis;C T Lee;J Dent,2017

5. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions - introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification;J G Caton;J Periodontol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3