Obstetrical Unit Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: OUR Study

Author:

Pluym Ilina D.1ORCID,Rao Rashmi1,Ballas Jerasimos2,Ramos Gladys A.2,Cross Sarah N.3,Zapata Mya1,Srinivas Sindhu4,Louis Judette M.5,Werner Erika6,Afshar Yalda1,Han Christina S.17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

7. Center for Fetal Medicine and Women's Ultrasound, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to describe the response of labor and delivery (L&D) units in the United States to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and determine how institutional characteristics and regional disease prevalence affect viral testing and personal protective equipment (PPE). Study Design A cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically through the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine e-mail database (n = 584 distinct practices) and social media between April 14 and 23, 2020. Participants were recruited through “snowballing.” A single representative was asked to respond on behalf of each L&D unit. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable regression was performed to explore characteristics associated with universal testing and PPE usage. Results A total of 301 surveys (estimated 51.5% response rate) was analyzed representing 48 states and two territories. Obstetrical units included academic (31%), community teaching (45%) and nonteaching hospitals (24%). Sixteen percent of respondents were from states with high prevalence, defined as higher “deaths per million” rates compared with the national average. Universal laboratory testing for admissions was reported for 40% (119/297) of units. After adjusting for covariates, universal testing was more common in academic institutions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23–2.42) and high prevalence states (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.37–5.28). When delivering asymptomatic patients, full PPE (including N95 mask) was recommended for vaginal deliveries in 33% and for cesarean delivery in 38% of responding institutions. N95 mask use during asymptomatic vaginal deliveries remained more likely in high prevalence states (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.29–5.09) and less likely in hospitals with universal testing (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24–0.73). Conclusion Universal laboratory testing for COVID-19 is more common at academic institutions and in states with high disease prevalence. Centers with universal testing were less likely to recommend N95 masks for asymptomatic vaginal deliveries, suggesting that viral testing can play a role in guiding efficient PPE use. Key Points

Funder

Clinical and Translational Science Institute Grant

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference16 articles.

1. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States;M L Holshue;N Engl J Med,2020

2. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic;D Cucinotta;Acta Biomed,2020

3. COVID19 during pregnancy: a systematic review of reported cases;A N Della Gatta;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2020

4. Protecting labor and delivery personnel from COVID-19 during the second stage of labor;A Palatnik;Am J Perinatol,2020

5. NOW!: protection for obstetrical providers and patients;V Berghella;Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM,2020

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3