Collision of Priorities in Posttraumatic Coma and Suspected Multiple Injuries: A Prospective Multicenter Trial

Author:

Firsching Raimund1,Voellger Benjamin2,Woischneck Dieter3,Rashidi Ali Mohammed4,König Rebecca4,Luchtmann Michael4

Affiliation:

1. Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Magdeburg, Germany

2. Otto-von-Guericke-Universitaet, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Magdeburg, Germany

3. Klinikum Landshut, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Landshut, Germany

4. Klinik für Neurochirurgie Magdeburg, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objective The presence of multiple injuries in addition to a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is initially uncertain in most patients with posttraumatic coma. The interdisciplinary team of physicians in charge of initial treatment after hospital admission may face a collision of vital priorities. The purpose of this study was to analyze which diagnostic and surgical measures were given priority over others in comatose patients after injury and to draw conclusions from these data. Methods In this prospective multicenter cohort study, the outcomes of 1,003 comatose patients with suspected multiple injuries were studied. The analysis was divided into an early and a late stage. Diagnostic and surgical measures were analyzed for a 6-month period. The prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grading scale were investigated. Results Removal of intracranial hematomas and decompressive craniotomies were the most frequent procedures within the first 48 hours after admission to the hospital. Prognosis depends on the location and the combination of injuries. Outcome is significantly correlated to initial signs of brainstem dysfunction. The GCS did not adequately predict clinical outcome. Conclusion Comatose patients with suspected multiple injuries should only be admitted to hospitals with a continuous neurosurgical service because intracranial operations are more frequent in the first 48 hours than extracranial operations. Depending on the neurologic status of the patient, an urgent surgical decompression may be essential for a good outcome. The GCS alone is not a sufficient tool for the neurologic assessment and the prognosis of patients with multiple injuries. The onset of clinical signs of brainstem dysfunction indicates a critical deterioration of the functioning of the central nervous system. The priority of surgical measures should be tailored accordingly.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Reference48 articles.

1. Epidemiology of head injury;B Jennett;J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1996

2. Management of multiple injured patients: treatment algorithms according to ATLS principles;F Hokema;Notarzt,2008

3. Interdisciplinary teamwork in the emergency room: a review of the literature;M Burkhardt;Intensivmed Notfallmed,2007

4. Das Schädel-Hirn-Trauma in der chirurgischen Akutversorgung Primärversorgung in einem Krankenhaus der Grund- und Regelversorgung;W Friedl;Der Chirurg.,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3