Pharmaceutical Expenditure Is Unchanged with Ultrasound-Guided Surfactant Administration

Abstract

Objective Semiquantitative lung ultrasound improves the timeliness of surfactant replacement, but its financial consequences are unknown. We aim to investigate if the ultrasound-guided surfactant administration influences the general costs of surfactant therapy for preterm neonates affected by respiratory distress syndrome. Study Design This is a pharmacoeconomic, retrospective, and before-and-after study investigating the impact of ultrasound-guided surfactant replacement (echography-guided Surfactant THERapy [ESTHER]) on pharmaceutical expenditure within the ESTHER initiative. Data extracted from the institutional official database hosted by the hospital administration for financial management were used for the analysis. We analyzed the number of surfactant administrations in neonates of gestational age ≤326/7 weeks, and the number of surfactant vials used from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 (i.e., during the period of standard surfactant administration policy) and from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 (that is during ESTHER policy). Results ESTHER did not modify surfactant use, as proportion of treated neonates with RDS receiving at least one surfactant dose (Standard: 21.3% vs. ESTHER: 20.9%; p = 0.876) or as proportion of used vials over the total number of vials opened for neonates of any gestational age (Standard: 37% vs. ESTHER: 35%; p = 0.509). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided surfactant replacement using a semiquantitative lung ultrasound score in preterm infants with RDS does not change the global use of surfactant and the related expenditure. Key Points