Sulodexide versus Control and the Risk of Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Events: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Author:

Bikdeli Behnood1234,Chatterjee Saurav5,Kirtane Ajay J.14,Parikh Sahil A.14,Andreozzi Giuseppe M.6,Desai Nihar R.37,Francese Dominic P.4,Gibson C Michael28,Piazza Gregory12,Goldhaber Samuel Z.12,Eikelboom John W.9,Krumholz Harlan M.3710,Stone Gregg W.411

Affiliation:

1. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

4. Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

5. Hoffman Heart Institute, Saint Francis Hospital, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut

6. Angiology Care Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

7. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

8. Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Division of Hematology and Thromboembolism, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

10. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

11. The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

Abstract

AbstractThrombotic cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, and venous thromboembolism [VTE]) remains a major cause of death and disability. Sulodexide is an oral glycosaminoglycan containing heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the cardiovascular efficacy, and safety of sulodexide versus control in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCTs reporting cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving sulodexide versus control (placebo or no treatment). Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, stroke, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and bleeding. We used inverse variance random-effects models with odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure. After screening 360 records, 6 RCTs including 7,596 patients (median follow-up duration: 11.6 months) were included. Patients were enrolled for history of MI, VTE, peripheral arterial disease, or cardiovascular risk factors plus nephropathy. Use of sulodexide compared with control was associated with reduced odds of all-cause mortality (OR 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.89, p = 0.02), and MI (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51–0.96, p = 0.03), and nonsignificantly reduced odds of stroke (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45–1.35, p = 0.38). Sulodexide was associated with significantly reduced odds of VTE (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24–0.81, p = 0.008), including DVT (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.65, p < 0.001), but not pulmonary embolism (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.40–2.15, p = 0.86). Bleeding events were not significantly different in the two groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.47–2.74, p = 0.48). In six RCTs across a variety of clinical indications, use of sulodexide compared with placebo or no treatment was associated with reduced odds of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, and DVT, without a significant increase in bleeding. Additional studies with this agent are warranted.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3