Virtual Reality Reduces Pain in Laboring Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Wong Melissa S.123ORCID,Spiegel Brennan M.R.3456,Gregory Kimberly D.127

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

3. Division of Informatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

4. Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California

5. Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

6. Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

7. Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

Objective Virtual reality (VR) represents a potential method for easing labor pain and in nonpregnant patients has been shown to achieve similar or greater analgesia than hydromorphone. Few studies of VR have been performed in pregnant women. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate whether VR is effective in reducing pain in laboring women. Study Design An open-label, RCT of nulliparous, term women in labor in a tertiary care hospital. We included women with a pain score level of 4 to 7 having regular contractions at least every 5 minutes. We excluded women who had received any pharmacologic pain relief including neuraxial analgesia and those with contraindications to VR. Participants were randomized to up to 30 minutes of either VR or the control arm (no additional intervention). Our primary outcome was the difference in differences from pre- to postintervention pain score. Prespecified secondary outcomes included postintervention pain scores, duration of intervention use, pharmacologic analgesia use, maternal vitals, and obstetric outcomes. Results From March 2018 to February 2019, 40 subjects were enrolled, randomized, and completed the study; 19 were randomized to control and 21 to the VR arm. Most baseline characteristics were similar between groups. For the primary outcome, those assigned to the control arm had a statistically significant increase in pain of +0.58, while the VR arm had a significant reduction in pain of −0.52 (p = 0.03). There was also a difference in the proportion who had a minimum clinically important difference in pain (0% control and 23.8% VR; p = 0.049). Postintervention maternal heart rate was higher in the control arm (86.8 vs. 76.3, p = 0.01). Most other secondary outcomes did not differ. Conclusion In our study, we found that VR was effective for reducing pain in women in labor as compared with those receiving no intervention. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference15 articles.

1. Births: final Data for 2015. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics;J A Martin;Natl Vital Stat Syst,2017

2. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery;J L Hawkins;N Engl J Med,2010

3. United States state-level variation in the use of neuraxial analgesia during labor for pregnant women;A J Butwick;JAMA Netw Open,2018

4. Use of complementary and alternative medicines by a sample of Australian women during pregnancy;H Skouteris;Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2008

5. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour;C A Smith;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3