Adolescent Kienböck's Disease: A Comparison between Lunate Offloading and Revascularization Procedures

Author:

Gillis Joshua A.1,Khouri Joseph S.1,Moran Steven L.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the outcomes and complication rate of surgical management in adolescent patients with Kienböck's disease and compare lunate offloading and revascularization procedures. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review to evaluate adolescent patients with Kienböck's disease between 1990 and 2016 who were surgically managed. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, presence of trauma, range of motion, grip strength, and radiographic parameters pre- and postoperative. Results We assessed 21 wrists in 20 patients. All had failed conservative management and required surgery. Seven patients underwent lunate offloading procedures, most commonly radial-shortening osteotomy, whereas 13 patients had an attempt at revascularization. All patients had either minimal or no pain at a clinical mean clinical follow-up of 63.4 months. Postoperatively, grip strength and radial deviation improved, with no difference between the two groups. Those that underwent joint offloading procedures had less ulnar variance. Eight of 11 patients with a postoperative MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) had evidence of lunate revascularization after a revascularization procedure. Conclusion Surgical management of Kienböck's disease in adolescent patients can yield satisfactory outcomes in those that fail conservative management. Level of Evidence/Type of study This is a Level IV, therapeutic study.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3