Data Collection during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning from Experience, Resulting in a Bayesian Repertory

Author:

Rutten Lex1ORCID,Smedley Tom2,Ives Galen3,Gold Peter4,Merizalde Bernardo5,van Haselen Robbert6,Manchanda Raj Kumar7,Ross Ashley8,Cataldi Gustavo9,Agaoglu Altunay10,di Giampietro Tiziana11,Lilas Theodore12,Schroyens Frederik13,Eizayaga José E.14

Affiliation:

1. Independent Researcher, Breda, the Netherlands

2. Independent Researcher, United Kingdom

3. Information School, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

4. American Institute of Homeopathy (AIH), United States

5. Department of Integrative Medicine and Scientific Nutrition, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia; Liga Medicorum Homeopathica Internationalis (LMHI), United States

6. International Institute for Integrated Medicine, Kingston, United Kingdom

7. Directorate of AYUSH, Govt. of Delhi, India

8. Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa

9. Liga Medicorum Homeopathica Internationalis (LMHI), Argentina

10. Liga Medicorum Homeopathica Internationalis (LMHI), Turkey

11. European Committee for Homeopathy (ECH), Italy

12. Vithoulkas Compass, Greece

13. ZEUS-SOFT, Belgium

14. Department of Homeopathy, Maimonides University, Argentina

Abstract

Abstract Background A novel pandemic disease offered the opportunity to create new, disease-specific, symptom rubrics for the homeopathic repertory. Objective The aim of this study was to discover the relationship between specific symptoms and specific medicines, especially of symptoms occurring frequently in this disease. Materials and Methods Worldwide collection of data in all possible formats by various parties was coordinated by the Liga Medicorum Homeopathica Internationalis. As the data came in, more symptoms were assessed prospectively. Frequent analysis and feedback by electronic newsletters were used to improve the quality of the data. Likelihood ratios (LRs) of symptoms were calculated. An algorithm for combining symptom LRs was programmed and published in the form of an app. The app was tested against 18 well-described successful cases from Hong Kong. Results LRs of common symptoms such as ‘Fatigue’ and ‘Headache’ provided better differentiation between medicines than did existing repertory entries, which are based only on the narrow presence or absence of symptoms. A mini-repertory for COVID-19 symptoms was published and supported by a web-based algorithm. With a choice of 20 common symptoms, this algorithm produced the same outcome as a full homeopathic analysis based upon a larger number of symptoms, including some that are traditionally considered more specific to particular medicines. Conclusion A repertory based on clinical data and LRs can differentiate between homeopathic medicines using a limited number of frequently occurring epidemic symptoms. A Bayesian computer algorithm to combine symptoms can complement a full homeopathic analysis of cases.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3