Organisational Health Services Research in Germany: A Scoping Review of Conference Abstracts

Author:

Nöst Stefan1ORCID,Miedaner Felix2ORCID,Anke Wagner3ORCID,Beckmann Marina4ORCID,Exworthy Mark5ORCID,Götz Katja6ORCID,Körner MirjamORCID,Mannion Russell5ORCID,Pfaff Holger7ORCID,Piotrowski Alexandra8ORCID,Hammer Antje9ORCID,Ansmann Lena4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Baden-Württemberg Cooperative State University Stuttgart, School of Health Sciences and Management, Stuttgart, Germany

2. Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Campus Wolfsburg, Faculty of Health Care and Health Care Science, Wolfsburg, Germany

3. University Hospital Tübingen, Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Tübingen, Germany

4. University of Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Cologne, Germany

5. University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

6. University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Institute of Family Medicine, Lübeck, Germany

7. University of Cologne, IMVR, Cologne, Germany

8. Witten/Herdecke University, Institute of General Practice and Outpatient Healthcare, Witten, Germany

9. University of Bonn, Institute for Patient Safety, Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Health Services Research (HSR) is a growing field in Germany, in which Organisational Health Services Research (OHSR) has emerged as a subfield. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the field of OHSR within HSR in Germany and to map systematically original contributions by describing the organisational setting, the research design, the research objectives and the theoretical underpinning. Methods A scoping review examined published abstracts from the 19th German Conference on Health Services Research 2020. Abstracts were included if (1) health care organisations, subunits or organisational processes were mentioned as research objects, and (2) if at least one out of five research perspectives from a recent German definition of OHSR was addressed. After intensive pilot screenings within a group of nine researchers, all abstracts were screened independently in three review teams with three researchers each, and data from included abstracts were extracted using content analysis based on a self-developed detailed coding scheme. Results Out of n=468 identified abstracts in German (84%) or English (16%) language, n=138 (29.5%) abstracts were included. The majority of included abstracts addressed acute care in hospitals (34.8%), reported results from observational studies (59.4%) and collected primary data (69.6%). There was a slightly higher use of quantitative (32.6%) than qualitative (24.6%) research methods with a considerable number of studies using more than one method (31.9%). An explicit reference to theory was made in 7.2% and 17.4% used the term ‘organisation’ or related terms explicitly in their abstract. Conclusion This review provides a systematic but preliminary overview of the scope to which HSR in Germany addresses OHSR. The organisational perspective is considered extensively in HSR abstracts, but mostly implicitly. The research is reported largely free of theory which can reduce their explanatory power. Therefore, a research agenda, more awareness as well as education and better conceptualisation of OHSR topics within German HSR are needed.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3