Capacities and Competences for Drug Evaluation in European Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Survey and Key Issues for Improvement

Author:

Elie Valery1,Neyro Virginia1,Ha Phuong1,Aurich Beate1,Leroux Stephanie1,Jacqz-Aigrain Evelyne123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatric Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Hospital Robert Debré, Assistance Publique–Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France

2. Clinical Investigation Center INSERM CIC1426, Robert Debré Hospital, Paris, France

3. Department of Pharmacology, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France

Abstract

Background Multicenter neonatal clinical trials aim to provide evidence-based drug evaluation, but recruiting neonates requires collaboration, standard procedures, and trained neonatologists. Methods A questionnaire based on a previous Delphi study was sent to European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to collect their research experience and identify areas for improvement. Results Of 247 NICUs,79 (32%) responded: 69 were level III units and 10 were level II units. In level III centers, 62% had medical staff dedicated to research and 65% conducted regular in-house audits. Similarities were observed in the median number of trials per year (level II: 2; level III: 5), Good Clinical Practice training (level II: 78%; level III: 66%), and standard operating procedures (level II: 63%; level III: 71%). Most NICUs had access to scientific advice for trial design, conduct, data management, and regulatory aspects. Involvement of patient advocacy groups was more common in level II units (level II: 75%; level III: 59%). A “quality” score of 34 “quality” research items was calculated for all centers (mean: 23.2 ± 6.2; range: 6–34). Conclusion Research experience and processes vary across Europe. Harmonizing research practices and setting standards will allow building a European neonatal network for effective, safe, and quality neonatal drug development.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3