Multicenter Evaluation of Nine Commercial Kits for the Quantitation of Anticardiolipin Antibodies

Author:

Reber G1,Arvieux J2,Comby E3,Degenne D4,de Moerloose P1,Sanmarco M5,Potron G6,

Affiliation:

1. The Haemostasis Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland

2. The Centre de Transfusion Sanguine, Grenoble, France

3. The Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen, France

4. The Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Tours, France

5. The Faculté de Médecine, Université d’Aix-Marseille II, France

6. The Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Reims, France

Abstract

SummaryThe performances of nine commercial kits and an in-house method (HM) for the quantitation of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) have been evaluated in a multicenter study. Ninety control and patient samples and six standards from Louisville University were run with kits and with the HM. Marked differences in positivity rate between kits were observed, ranging from 31 to 60% for IgG and 6 to 50% for IgM. Concordance between kits occurred in 59 and 51% of samples for IgG and IgM respectively. Concordance coefficients (kappa) ranged from 0.13 to 0.92. Slopes of regression lines between the declared units of Louisville standards and the units measured from the calibrators of the kits showed great diversity and ranged from 0.159 to 0.931 for IgG and from 0.236 to 0.836 for IgM. The β2-glycoprotein I (β2-GPI) content of the dilution buffers and the wells supplied with the kits revealed noticeable differences. However samples containing anti-(β2-GPI antibodies were classified similarly by all but one kit. In contrast the ability to measure samples devoid of anti-β2-GPI antibodies differed markedly between the kits.This study shows that differences in positivity rates between the commercial kits may contribute to the differences in ACA prevalence rate found in the literature. The choice of cut-off levels may partly explain the moderate concordance between the kits. In addition some samples behave very differently depending on the kits. In spite of the expression of results in PL units, standardization of ACA assays has not been achieved.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3