Abstract
Abstract:Computer-based patient data which are represented in a coded form have a variety of uses, including direct patient care, statistical reporting, automated decision support, and clinical research. No standard exists which supports all of these functions. Abstracting coding systems, such as ICD, CPT, DRGs and MeSH fail to provide adequate detail, forcing application developers to create their own coding schemes for systems. Some of these schemes have been put forward as possible standards, but they have not been widely accepted. This paper reviews existing schemes used for abstracting, electronic record systems, and comprehensive coding. It also discusses the remaining impediments to acceptance of standards and the current efforts to overcome them, including SNOMED, the Gabrieli Medical Nomenclature, the Read Clinical Codes, GALEN, and the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS).
Subject
Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Health Informatics
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Clinical Data Warehousing: A Scoping Review;Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management;2024-08-28
2. Billing and Review Perspectives in Healthcare;Theory and Practice of Business Intelligence in Healthcare;2020
3. The nature of data;Veterinary Epidemiology;2018-02-23
4. Development and Evaluation of a Similarity Measure for Medical Event Sequences;ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems;2017-08-24
5. An analysis of electronic health record–related patient safety incidents;Health Informatics Journal;2016-03-07