Author:
Gjørup Th.,Saurbrey Nina,Hermann N.
Abstract
SummaryIn 35 women referred for induced abortion, the duration of pregnancy was stated with an accuracy of one week on the basis of the gynaecologic examination. This was done by one doctor with knowledge of the duration of amenorrhoea (clinical estimate) and by one doctor without this knowledge (“blind” estimate). Agreement was found between the duration of amenorrhoea and the duration of pregnancy for 89% of the clinical estimates and for 46% of the “blind” estimates. Prior to the study the doctor who made the “blind” estimates had—with knowledge of the duration of amenorrhoea—examined 26 similar women and had obtained agreement as to 88% of her estimates. For the clinical estimates, the difference between the duration of amenorrhoea and the duration of pregnancy did not exceed one week, whereas for the “blind” estimates, it amounted to as much as 3 weeks. It is concluded that doctors’ clinical estimate of the duration of pregnancy is influenced by their knowledge of the duration of amenorrhoea.
Subject
Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Health Informatics
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献