Use of Social Media and an Online Survey to Discuss Complex Reconstructive Surgery: A Case of Upper Lip Reconstruction with 402 Responses from International Microsurgeons

Author:

Kwon Soo-Ha1,Lee Che-Hsiung1,Hsu Angela12,Shafarenko Mark3,Omar Usama4,Tzou Chieh-Han5,Roka-Palkovits Julia6,Beltrán P Aldo7,Liakos Dimitri8,Chang Tommy1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung Medical College and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

2. Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan

3. University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Al-Hekma Specialized Hospital, Egypt

5. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria

6. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria

7. Surgical Department. Plastic Surgery Service, Hand Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario Erasmo Meoz, Columbia

8. Plastic, Reconstructive and Microsurgeon WITS Donald Gordon Medical Center and Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background The best reconstructive strategy for upper lip defects is still in debate. The purpose of this study was to analyze the decisions made by international microsurgeons, who were participated through online questionnaire, distributed by email and social media network. Materials and Methods A case of a two-thirds upper lip oncologic defect was presented via an online questionnaire and 402 microsurgeons replied their treatment options. The data were then analyzed according to the geographic area, microsurgical fellowship, seniority, and subspecialty. All the data were analyzed using SPSS 22. Results A total of 27.7% of microsurgeons chose a free flap, while 72.3% chose a local/pedicle flap as their preferred method for reconstruction. The most common choice of free and local/pedicle flaps was radial forearm (73.6%) and Abbé (36.2%), respectively. The microsurgeons in Europe preferred local/pedicle flaps than free flap when compared with Middle/South America, Asia-Pacific, Africa and South Asia/Middle East (11.6% versus 50%, 43.4%, 29.3% and 27.3%, respectively, multivariant p < 0.05). The microsurgeons with microsurgical fellowships preferred to use free flaps (32.9% versus 17.5%, multivariant p = 0.021). There was no difference for the seniority and specialty of the microsurgeons. Conclusions The online questionnaire is valuable and feasible for obtaining experts' opinions. This study provides a current global overview of surgical preferences for this common complicated clinical scenario.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3