Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?

Author:

Fürst Nicole1,Kiechle Marion1,Strahwald Brigitte2,Quante Anne134

Affiliation:

1. Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany

2. Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU München, München, Germany

3. Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Lehrstuhl für Genetische Epidemiologie, LMU München, München, Germany

4. Institut für Genetische Epidemiologie, Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The mammography screening programme has been the subject of criticism for some time. Invitation to take part is currently based only on the risk factors of age and female sex, whereby women with an above-average risk are screened too seldom and women with a low risk are possibly screened too often. In future, an individualised risk assessment could make a risk-adapted procedure possible in breast cancer screening. In the RISIKOLOTSE.DE project, schemes are devised to calculate the individual breast cancer risk and evaluate the results. The aim is to assist doctors and screening participants in participatory decision-making. To gauge the baseline situation in the target groups, qualitative and quantitative surveys were conducted. Method At the start of the project, a guideline-based focus group discussion was held with 15 doctors and representatives of the public health service. The transcript of this discussion was evaluated by means of a qualitative content analysis. Results The participants assessed the concept of risk-adapted screening positively overall. At the same time, the majority of them were of the opinion that the results of individualised risk calculation can be understood and evaluated adequately only by doctors. The great communication requirement and lack of remuneration were given as practical obstacles to implementation. Discussion The suggestions and new ideas from the focus group ranged from administrative and regulatory changes to new forms of counselling and adaptable practice aids. An important indicator for the RISIKOLOTSE.DE conception and for planning future surveys was that risk calculation for mammography screening 2.0 was regarded as a purely medical function and that the concept of participatory decision-making played hardly any part in the discussion.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3