Endoscopic characterization of small colonic polyps: baseline performance of experienced endoscopists is no different to that of medical students

Author:

Basford Peter1,Brown James2,Cooper Sarah2,Bhandari Pradeep3

Affiliation:

1. Western Sussex Hospitals NSH Trust, St. Richard’s Hospital, Chichester PO19 5NY, UK

2. Pharmacology and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, St. Michael’s Building, White Swan Rd, Portsmouth PO1 2DT, UK

3. Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham PO6 3LY, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies examining the impact of training modules on characterization of diminutive colonic polyps (DCP) show varying results. Aim We aimed to assess the impact of a novel web-based training module on the accuracy of in vivo characterization of DCPs using different imaging modalities. Differences between groups with varying degrees of endoscopic experience were also assessed. Methods In total, 90 images of 30 DCPs viewed with high definition white light (HDWL), i-Scan, and indigo carmine chromoendoscopy were included in an online test module. Testing was undertaken before and after completing a novel web-based in vivo characterization training module. In total, 21 subjects (medical students (MS), gastroenterology trainees (GT), and gastroenterology consultants (GC)) undertook the tests and training module. Results No statistically significant difference in overall accuracy was found between the three groups either pre- (MS 59.1 %, GR 65.7 %, GC 62.4 %, P = ns for all three comparisons) or post-training (MS 69.2 %, GR 71.1 %, GC 71.3 %, P = ns for all three comparisons). Accuracy improved significantly for all three groups post-training (P < 0.001) as did interobserver agreement. No significant differences in accuracy between modalities were found pre-training (HDWL 64.8 %, i-Scan 60.0 %, chromoendoscopy 62.2 %, P = ns). Post-training accuracy with HDWL and chromoendoscopy was better than with i-Scan (HDWL 72.9 % vs i-Scan 65.1 %, P = 0.002; i-Scan 65.1 % vs chromoendoscopy 73.7 %, P < 0.001). The proportion of high confidence predictions increased from 25.7 % to 41.5 %, with a high confidence prediction accuracy of 81.7 %. Conclusions Skills for in vivo characterization of DCPs are not acquired through endoscopic experience alone. A novel web-based training intervention results in modest improvements in accuracy with further improvements likely to require more prolonged training.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3