Trial of Therapy on Trial: Inconsistent Thresholds for Discussing Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Author:

Meadow Jacqueline1ORCID,Arzu Jennifer2,Rychlik Karen3,Henner Natalia45

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan

2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

3. Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

4. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

5. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to establish the degree of variability in thresholds for discussing withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST) in periviable infants among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) personnel. Study Design A vignette-style survey was administered to NICU personnel at two urban NICUs assessing likelihood of discussing WLST or support for discussing WLST (on a scale from 1, not at all likely/supportive to 10, extremely likely/supportive) in 10 clinical scenarios. Results Response rates ranged by clinical role from 26 to 89%. Participant responses ranged from 1 to 10 in 5 out of 10 vignettes for NICU attendings, and 9 out of 10 vignettes for bedside nurses. Lower gestational age (22–23 vs. 24–25 weeks) was associated with increased likelihood to discuss WLST in some but not all scenarios. Conclusion NICU personnel have widely variable criteria for discussing WLST which threatens the informed consent process surrounding resuscitation decisions in a “trial of therapy” framework. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference26 articles.

1. Births in the United States, 2018;J AHB Martin;NCHS Data Brief,2019

2. Outcomes for extremely premature infants;H C Glass;Anesth Analg,2015

3. Births: final data for 2018;J AHB Martin;Natl Vital Stat Rep,2019

4. A systematic review of severe morbidity in infants born late preterm;M J Teune;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2011

5. Periviable birth and the shifting limit of viability;B M Mercer;Clin Perinatol,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3