Understanding the Factors that Determine a Fellow's Choice in Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine and How They Establish Their Rank List

Author:

Kane Sara K.1ORCID,Palmer Megan M.2,Slaven James E.3,Niehaus Jason Z.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

3. Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Abstract

Objective Little is known about why neonatology fellows pick the fellowship program they do. Understanding why fellows choose neonatology and rank their programs would be of benefit to program leadership and to other applicants. Study Design This was a survey study sent to current neonatology fellows in the United States between September 2020 and October 2020, and were asked to rank their choices on a Likert scale. Respondents were also able to give free text responses to open-ended questions. Results The most important factor fellows state for choosing their program was location, with multiple reasons given. There were significant differences in how certain subgroups ranked programs. Conclusion Location of the fellowship program is the most important factor for fellows. There are differences within subgroups of fellows on how they rank their fellowship program. Fellowship directors can use this information to better inform selections on who to interview and how to rank fellows. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference14 articles.

1. Council of Pediatric Subspecialties (CoPS): the first five years;R Mink;Pediatrics,2012

2. Factors neurosurgery candidates use when choosing a residency program;L H Marasa;J Neurosurg,2014

3. Comparison of applicant criteria and program expectations for choosing residency programs in the otolaryngology match;S Sharp;Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2011

4. A formal reception improves orthopaedic surgery residency program applicant perceptions of the interview experience;J M Lantry;J Ky Med Assoc,2008

5. Emergency medicine residency applicant views on the Interview Day process;N M Deiorio;Acad Emerg Med,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3