Changing Management of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus: Effect on Neonatal Outcomes and Resource Utilization

Author:

Goel Veena12,Palma Jonathan32,Luh Thomas3,Wang Nichole3,Gaskari Shabnam4,Punn Rajesh5,Silverman Norman5,Benitz William3,Chock Valerie3

Affiliation:

1. Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

2. Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

3. Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

4. Pediatric Pharmacy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

5. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

Abstract

Objective This historical cohort study investigated how a shift toward a more conservative approach of awaiting spontaneous closure of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants has affected neonatal outcomes and resource utilization. Methods We retrospectively studied very low birth weight infants diagnosed with a PDA by echocardiogram (ECHO) in 2006–2008 (era 1), when medical or surgical PDA management was emphasized, to those born in 2010–2012 (era 2) when conservative PDA management was encouraged. Multiple regression analyses adjusted for gestational age were performed to assess differences in clinical outcomes and resource utilization between eras. Results More infants in era 2 (35/89, 39%) compared with era 1 (22/120, 18%) had conservative PDA management (p < 0.01). Despite no difference in surgical ligation rate, infants in era 2 had ligation later (median 24 vs. 8 days, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in clinical outcomes between eras, while number of ECHOs per patient was the only resource measure that increased in era 2 (median 3 vs. 2 ECHOs, p = 0.003). Conclusion In an era of more conservative PDA management, no increase in adverse clinical outcomes or significant change in resource utilization was found. Conservative PDA management may be a safe alternative for preterm infants.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3