Second exam of right colon improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Kamal Faisal1,Khan Muhammad Ali2,Lee-Smith Wade3,Sharma Sachit45,Acharya Ashu4,Imam Zaid6,Farooq Umer7,Hanson John8,Pulous Vian8,Aziz Muhammad9,Chandan Saurabh10,Kouanda Abdul1,Dai Sun-Chuan1,Munroe Craig A.1,Howden Colin W.11

Affiliation:

1. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California-San Francisco, California, United States

2. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas MD

3. Mulford Health Sciences Library, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States

4. Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States

5. Division of Gastroenterology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States

6. Division of Gastroenterology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

7. Department of Medicine, Loyola Medicine/MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, Illinois, United States

8. Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States

9. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States

10. Division of Gastroenterology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States

11. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims A second examination of the right colon, either as a second forward view (SFV) or as retroflexion (RF) in the cecum, can increase adenoma detection rate (ADR) in the right colon. In this meta-analysis, we have evaluated the role of a second examination of the right colon in improving ADR. Methods We reviewed several databases to identify randomized controlled trials that compared right colon SFV with no SFV, and RCTs that compared SFV with RF in the right colon, and reported data on ADR. Our outcomes of interest were ADR and polyp detection rate (PDR) with SFV vs no SFV, right colon and total withdrawal times, and additional ADR and PDR with SFV vs RF. For categorical variables, we calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs); for continuous variables, we calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % CI. Data were analyzed using random effects model. Results We included six studies with 3901 patients. Comparing SFV with no SFV, right colon ADR and PDR were significantly higher in the SFV group: ADR (RR [95 % CI] 1.39 [1.22,1.58]) and PDR (RR [95 % CI] 1.47 [1.30, 1.65]). We found no significant difference in right colon withdrawal time (SMD [95 % CI] 1.54 [–0.20,3.28]) or total withdrawal time (SMD (95 % CI) 0.37 [–0.39,1.13]) with and without SFV. We found no significant difference in additional ADR between SFV and RF. Conclusions SFV of the right colon significantly increases right-sided and overall ADR.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Adenoma detection rate vs. adenoma per colonoscopy as quality indicators for colon cancer screening;Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology;2023-07

2. Optimizing adenoma detection in screening-related colonoscopy;Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology;2023-05-10

3. Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review;Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology;2023-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3