Institution-Specific Perinatal Emergency Checklists: Multicenter Report on Development, Implementation, and Sustainability

Author:

Quist-Nelson Johanna1ORCID,Hannenberg Alexander2,Ruymann Kathryn3,Stover Angela4,Baxter Jason K.3,Smith Stephen5,Angle Heidi6,Gupta Neeru7,Lopez Connie M.7,Hunt Eric7,Tully Kristin P.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

2. Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

4. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Abington Hospital, Abington, Pennsylvania

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, San Francisco, California

Abstract

Objective The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine endorse checklist use to improve obstetric care. However, there is limited research into development, implementation, and sustained use of perinatal emergency checklists to inform individual institutions. This study aimed to investigate the development and implementation of perinatal emergency checklists in diverse hospital settings in the United States. Study Design A qualitative study was conducted individually with clinicians from three health care systems. The participants developed and implemented institution-tailored perinatal emergency checklists. Interview transcriptions were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results The study sites included two health care systems and one individual hospital. Delivery volumes ranged from 3,500 to 48,000 deliveries a year. Interviews were conducted with all 10 participants approached. Checklists for 19 perinatal emergencies were developed at the three health care systems. Ten of the checklist topics were the same at all three institutions. Participants described the checklists as improving patient care during crises. The tools were viewed as opportunities to promote a shared mental model across clinical roles, to reduce redundancy and coordinate obstetric crisis management. Checklist were developed in small groups. Implementation was facilitated by those who developed the checklists. Participants agreed that simulation was essential for checklist refinement and effective use by response teams. Barriers to implementation included limited clinician availability. There was also an opportunity to strengthen integration of checklists workflow early in perinatal emergencies. Participants articulated that culture change took time, active practice, persistence, reinforcement, and process measurement. Conclusion This study outlines processes to develop, implement, and sustain perinatal emergency checklists at three institutions. Participants agreed that multiple, parallel implementation tactics created the culture shift for integration. The overview and specific Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research components may be used to inform adaptation and sustainability for others considering implementing perinatal emergency checklists. Key Points

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3