Efficacy and safety of PICOPREP tailored dosing compared with PICOPREP day-before dosing for colon cleansing: a multi-centric randomised study

Author:

Kiesslich Ralf1,Schubert Stefan2,Mross Michael3,Klugmann Tobias4,Klemt-Kropp Michael5,Behnken Imke6,Bonnaud Gillaume7,Keulen Eric8,Groenen Marcel9,Blaker Michael10,Ponchon Thierry11,Landry Wilfred12,Stoltenberg Meredin13

Affiliation:

1. Klinikdirektor ZIM II, Sprecher ZIM (Zentrum für Innere Medizin), Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Germany

2. Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz, Berlin, Germany

3. Praxis Dr. med. Michael R Mross, Berlin, Germany

4. Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Germany

5. Medisch Centrum, Alkmaar, the Netherlands

6. Internistisches Facharztzentrum Dr M Scholz, Langen, Germany

7. Clinique des Cèdres, Blagnac, France

8. Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, the Netherlands

9. Rijnstate Arnhem, Wagnerlaan, the Netherlands

10. Gastroenterologie Eppendorfer Baum, Hamburg, Germany

11. Ed Herriot Hopìtal, Lyon, France

12. MVZ Dachau, Dachau, Germany

13. Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kay Fiskers Plads 11 Copenhagen S, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims The success of any colonoscopy procedure depends upon the quality of bowel preparation. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new tailored dosing (TD) regimen compared with the approved PICOPREP day-before dosing regimen (DBD) in the European Union. Patient and methods Patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing colonoscopy were randomised (2:1) to TD (Dose 1, 10 – 18 hours; Dose 2, 4 – 6 hours before colonoscopy) or DBD (Dose 1 before 8:00AM on the day before colonoscopy; Dose 2, 6 – 8 hours after Dose 1). The primary endpoint of overall colon cleansing efficacy was based on total Ottawa Scale (OS) scores (0 – 14, excellent-worst). The key secondary endpoint was a binary endpoint based on the ascending colon OS (success 0 or 1, failure [≥ 2]). Convenience and satisfaction were evaluated similar to the primary and key secondary endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results Use of the PICOPREP TD regimen resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the mean total Ottawa Scale score compared to the PICOPREP DBD regimen (–3.93, 95 % confidence intervals [CI]: – 4.99, – 2.97; P < 0.0001) in the intent-to-treat analysis set. The PICOPREP TD regimen also resulted in a statistically significant increase in the odds of achieving an ascending colon OS score ≤ 1, compared to the PICOPREP DBD regimen (estimated odds ratio 9.18, 95 % CI: 4.36, 19.32; P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (12 % (TD) and 5.7 % (DBD), respectively, P = 0.2988). The convenience and satisfaction were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion The TD regimen was superior to the DBD regimen for overall and ascending colon cleansing efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02239692

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3