Extending magnifying NBI diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia in the stomach: the white opaque substance marker

Author:

Kanemitsu Takao1,Yao Kenshi2,Nagahama Takashi1,Imamura Kentaro1,Fujiwara Shoko2,Ueki Toshiharu1,Chuman Kenta3,Tanabe Hiroshi3,Atsuko Ota3,Iwashita Akinori3,Shimokawa Toshio4,Uchita Kunihisa5,Kanesaka Takashi6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

2. Department of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

3. Department of Pathology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

4. Department of Interdisciplinary Research, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

5. Department of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital, Kochi, Japan

6. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease, Osaka, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Intestinal metaplasia (IM) of the stomach is associated with an increased risk of differentiated gastric cancer. While it is important to diagnose IM endoscopically, it can be difficult to observe by white-light endoscopy. In magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) of the stomach, a light-blue crest (LBC) is widely known to be a useful marker in the endoscopic diagnosis of IM. However, IM that exhibits only white opaque substance (WOS) without an LBC can also occur. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether the presence of WOS on M-NBI of the stomach could serve as a marker of IM in the same way that an LBC does. Methods The subjects were 40 consecutive patients who underwent M-NBI between July and December 2014. The primary endpoint in this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of M-NBI for histologically observed IM in WOS- and LBC-positive mucosa. Results The sensitivity and specificity of WOS for histologically diagnosed IM were 50.0 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 40.0 % – 50.0 %) and 100.0 % (95 %CI 85.0 % – 100.0 %), respectively. Meanwhile, the sensitivity and specificity of LBC were 62.5 % (95 %CI 51.1 % – 65.9 %) and 93.8 % (95 %CI 76.7 % – 98.9 %), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of WOS and/or LBC (WOS positive and LBC positive, WOS positive and LBC negative, or WOS negative and LBC positive) for histologically diagnosed IM were 87.5 % (95 %CI 76.9 % – 90.9 %) and 93.8 % (95 %CI 77.9 % – 98.9 %), respectively. Conclusions LBC and WOS are both useful markers for endoscopic diagnosis of IM. Combining both markers improves the sensitivity.Clinical trial number: UMINCTR000014453.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3