Does Additional Review of Initial Radiographs by Musculoskeletal Specialists Limit Additional Advanced Imaging in Suspected Hip Fractures?

Author:

Miller Andrew S.1ORCID,Vattigunta Saisanjana1,Sharma Sribava1,Ahmed Abdulaziz F.1,Jenkins Sabrina G.1,Thakkar Savyasachi1,Srikumaran Uma1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

AbstractPatients with suspected fractures of the hip usually require significant time and resources for care, sometimes including advanced imaging. Optimizing care may improve patient outcomes and reduce the financial burden of hip fractures. Few studies have investigated approaches to reduce the utilization of additional imaging to diagnose hip fractures. The objective of this study was to determine if the utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can be reduced for suspected hip fracture patients via additional review of initial hip radiographs by musculoskeletal specialists. This may aid imaging referral guidelines for patients with a clinical suspicion of a hip fracture and reduce the amount of costly additional imaging. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted of hip fracture patients from five hospitals in an academic health system from 2015 to 2018. The study included initial radiographs of 108 patients, all of which were considered inconclusive at the time of service by radiologist reports and subsequently diagnosed with a hip fracture after receiving additional imaging. Four musculoskeletal specialists were asked to evaluate if the radiographs were positive for hip fracture, negative for hip fracture, or required additional imaging. A positive hip fracture was correctly identified by musculoskeletal specialists from the initial radiograph in 37 to 50% of cases. There was no statistically significant difference between reviewers of different levels of training in identifying hip fractures (p = 0.19) or ordering additional imaging (p = 0.235). There was a moderately positive interclass correlation across reviewers who correctly identified a hip fracture (interclass correlation coefficients [ICC] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–0.70), as well as reviewers who requested additional imaging (ICC = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25–0.60). Review of initial radiographs by musculoskeletal specialists could reduce the utilization of additional advanced imaging by up to 50% in patients with a suspected hip fracture. This is a level III evidence study.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference22 articles.

1. Hip fracture care and national systems: The United States and Canada;T Swenning;OTA Int,2020

2. Incidence and economic burden of intertrochanteric fracture: a medicare claims database analysis;A Adeyemi;JBJS Open Access,2019

3. Hip fracture: diagnosis, treatment, and secondary prevention;K E LeBlanc;Am Fam Physician,2014

4. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: poor cost utility for treatment of adult patients with hip pain;J A Keeney;Clin Orthop Relat Res,2014

5. Imaging choices in occult hip fracture;J Cannon;J Emerg Med,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3