The Bikini Approach is Safe and Effective for Direct Anterior Approach THA

Author:

Weiner Travis R.1ORCID,Neuwirth Alexander L.1,Geller Jeffrey A.1,Shah Roshan P.1,Hickernell Thomas R.1ORCID,Cooper H. John1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Abstract

AbstractConventional incision orientation for direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is longitudinal, paralleling fibers of the tensor fascia latae. Alternatively, a “bikini” incision can be oriented along Langer's lines. We sought to determine if there were any differences in surgical site complications (SSCs), mechanical complications, or reoperation between longitudinal and bikini DAA. We retrospectively reviewed 420 consecutive primary DAA THA by a single surgeon over a 2-year period. The surgeon was experienced with both incision orientations. Complications were recorded by chart review. Chi-square tests were used to examine for differences between categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Longitudinal incisions were used in 320 patients (76.2%) while bikini incisions were used in 100 patients (23.8%). Women were significantly more likely to have a bikini incision (39.1% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.00001). Across the entire cohort, patients undergoing THA through either longitudinal or bikini incision had comparable rates of SSCs (4.7% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.90). With longitudinal incisions, SSCs were more likely to occur in obese patients compared with nonobese patients (8.3% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.04). With bikini incisions, there was no difference in the rate of SSCs between obese and nonobese patients (4.0% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.79). There were no differences in mechanical complications or rates of reoperation (0.3% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.58). Both longitudinal and bikini incisions are safe and effective ways to perform the DAA for primary THA, with no differences in rates of SSCs, mechanical complications, or reoperation. For obese patients in this series, the bikini incision was associated with a lower rate of SSCs but requires future study due to dissimilar study groups.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3