Current clinical and research practices on frontotemporal dementia in Brazil: a national survey

Author:

Souza Leonardo Cruz de12ORCID,Brucki Sonia Maria Dozzi3ORCID,Schilling Lucas Porcello456ORCID,Silva Letícia Costa da2ORCID,Takada Leonel Tadao3ORCID,Bahia Valéria Santoro7ORCID,Barbosa Breno José Alencar Pires38ORCID,Balthazar Marcio Luiz Figueredo9ORCID,Frota Norberto Anizio Ferreira1011ORCID,Nitrini Ricardo3ORCID,Caramelli Paulo12ORCID,Smid Jerusa3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil.

2. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Grupo de Pesquisa em Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil.

3. Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

4. Pontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Medicina, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.

5. Pontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.

6. Pontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gerontologia Biomédica, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.

7. Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

8. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Médicas, Área Acadêmica de Neuropsiquiatria, Recife PE, Brazil.

9. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

10. Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Serviço de Neurologia, Fortaleza CE, Brazil.

11. Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR), Fortaleza CE, Brazil.

Abstract

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a frequent cause of young-onset dementia and represents a major challenge for the diagnosis and clinical management. It is essential to evaluate the difficulties faced by physicians on the diagnostic workup and on patient care. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the current practices and the local limits on the diagnosis and management of FTD in Brazil. Methods We elaborated an online survey, composed of 29 questions and divided in four parts, comprising questions about existing health facilities, clinical practices related to FTD, and suggestions to increment the national research on FTD. The invitation to participate was sent by email to all neurologists affiliated to the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (n = 3658), and to all physicians who attended the XII Meeting of Researchers on Alzheimer's disease, in 2019 (n = 187). The invitation was also diffused through social media. Results 256 Brazilian physicians answered the questionnaire. The three most relevant disorders for the differential diagnosis of FTD were Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 211), bipolar disorder (n = 117) and dementia with Lewy bodies (n = 92). Most respondents (125/256) reported the difficulty in performing genetic testing as the main limit in the diagnostic of FTD. 93% and 63% of participants considered that the assessment of social cognition and AD CSF biomarkers are useful for the diagnosis of FTD, respectively. Conclusions The present study may provide valuable insights for the medical education and clinical training of physicians, and to foster future research on FTD in Brazil.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Neurology,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3