Knowledge Gaps in Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Author:

Carusi Daniela A.1,Duzyj Christina M.2,Hecht Jonathan L.3,Butwick Alexander J.4,Barrett Jon5,Holt Roxane6,O'Rinn Susan E.7,Afshar Yalda8,Gilner Jennifer B.9,Newton J. M.10,Shainker Scott A.11,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

7. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California

9. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

10. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Since its first description early in the 20th Century, placenta accreta and its variants have changed substantially in incidence, risk factor profile, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. While systematic use of diagnostic tools and a multidisciplinary team care approach has begun to improve patient outcomes, the condition's pathophysiology, epidemiology, and best practices for diagnosis and management remain poorly understood. The use of large databases with broadly accepted terminology and diagnostic criteria should accelerate research in this area. Future work should focus on non-traditional phenotypes, such as those without placenta previa–preventive strategies, and long term medical and emotional support for patients facing this diagnosis. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference71 articles.

1. A study of placenta accreta;F C Irving;Am J Obstet Gynecol,1937

2. Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta;A G Eller;BJOG,2009

3. Effect of predelivery diagnosis in 99 consecutive cases of placenta accreta;C R Warshak;Obstet Gynecol,2010

4. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries;R M Silver;Obstet Gynecol,2006

5. Morbidly adherent placenta treatments and outcomes;J L Bailit;Obstet Gynecol,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3