Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps

Author:

Ibrahim Amr1,Gertallah Loay M.1,Abdelaziz Mahmoud2,Hemeda Rehab3,Gomaa Ahmed Fathy4,Ghoneme Mahmoud5,Sherbeiny Mahmoud6,Sharaf Ahmed Lotfy7,Harb Ola A.8ORCID,Amin Mohamed Farouk1

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansura University, Mansoura, Egypt

3. Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

5. Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Infectious Diseases Faculty of Medicine, Alazhar University, Cairo, Egypt

6. Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt

7. Department of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

8. Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

Abstract

Abstract Background Due to few sufficient data regarding the comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of malignant colorectal polyps regarding outcomes and survival benefits, there are no clear guidelines of management strategies of malignant colorectal polyps.The aims of the present study were to compare endoscopic resection alone and surgical resection in patients with malignant polyps in the colon (T1N0M0) readings advantages, disadvantages, recurrence risks, survival benefits, and long-term prognosis to detect how management strategy affects outcome. Patients and methods we included 350 patients. All included patients were divided into 2 groups; the first group included 100 patients who underwent only endoscopic polypectomy and the second group included 250 patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomy followed by definitive surgical resection after histopathological diagnosis.We followed all patients for about 5 years, ranging from 18 to 55 months.The primarily evaluated parameters are surgical consequences and patients' morbidity. The secondary evaluated parameters are recurrence risks, recurrence free survival, and overall survival rates. Results The age of patients who underwent polypectomy is usually younger than the surgical group, males have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with females.Patients with tumors in the left colon have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with the right colon (p < 0.0001). Tumor factors associated with more liability to surgical resection are presence of lymphovascular invasion, high grade, and poor tumor differentiation (p < 0.0001).The management strategy was the most significant predictor of overall and recurrence free survival rates in patients with malignant colon polyps (p < 0.001). Conclusions We found that survival benefits and lower incidence of recurrence are detected in the surgical resection group more than in the polypectomy group.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3