Affiliation:
1. Ophthalmology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the long-term outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab in eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DME) following a PRN (pro re nata) regimen. Additionally, we investigated
the effect of the presence of disorganisation of the retinal inner layers (DRILs) and pachychoroid (PC) at baseline on clinical outcome.
Methods This retrospective study included 112 naïve eyes with DME that were followed up for 2 years. All eyes were treated with six initial bevacizumab injections at monthly
intervals and then received treatment according to a PRN regimen. In case of poor response to bevacizumab, therapy was switched to other agents. Main outcome measures included:
best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and number of intravitreal injections (IVI s). In addition, we examined the effect of the presence of DRILs and PC at
baseline on clinical outcome.
Results BVCA improved significantly and CMT decreased significantly during the first 2 years of treatment. The number of IVI s per eye was 11.1 ± 4.8 at the end of the second year.
Treatment had to be switched to other agents in 47 eyes (42%). The timing of switching was 12.4 ± 6.1 months after a mean of 9.2 ± 3.3 IVI s. Patients with DRILs at baseline (29.5%) had
significantly worse BCVA at all time points before and after treatment, although CMT was significantly lower before treatment and comparable to patients without DRILs during treatment.
Patients with PC at baseline (35.7%) had no significant differences in BVCA and CMT at all time points compared with patients without PC.
Conclusions This study demonstrates statistically significant functional and anatomical improvement in patients with DME treated with intravitreal bevacizumab after 2 years. However,
more than 40% of eyes required a switch in therapy. The presence of DRILs at baseline had a negative effect whereas the presence of PC at baseline had no effect on clinical outcome.