Affiliation:
1. Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Small Animals and Horses,
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2. Link & Jopp Small Animal Veterinary Specialists, Starnberg,
Germany
Abstract
AbstractOver the past 2 decades, the increasing availability of computed tomography (CT)
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as the growing professional
expertise have significantly improved the diagnostics of middle and inner ear
diseases in dogs and cats. In answering some of the diagnostic questions, CT and
MRT demonstrate equivalent performance. For most questions, however, there are
differences in the diagnostic performance due to the physical imaging properties
of the 2 modalities.CT is more sensitive in demonstrating involvement of the bulla wall and is more
effective for detecting abnormal content within the tympanic bulla. In addition,
with CT it is often easier to guide tissue samplings. On the other hand,
structural changes of the soft tissues of the skull, head, meninges, brain, and
nerves are not or only insufficiently detectable on CT images. MRI is clearly
superior here. Therefore, MRI is essential for the characterization of materials
inside the bulla cavity and for demonstrating the extent of any central spread
of otitis media (OM).In this image essay, CT and MRI features of OM and resulting secondary lesions
described in the literature are analyzed and summarized. Own image examples are
used for illustration. Information on the etiology, pathogenesis,
pathomorphology, and clinical signs important for understanding these changes
are presented in concise descriptions.