Systematic Review of Innovative Diagnostic Tests for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome

Author:

Ritchie Ewan D.1,Vogels Sanne12ORCID,van Dongen Thijs T. C. F.13,van der Burg Boudewijn L. S. Borger1,Scheltinga Marc R. M.4,Zimmermann Wes O.56,Hoencamp Rigo1378

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital Location Leiderdorp, Leiderdorp, Netherlands

2. Department of Trauma Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

3. Defence Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defense, Utrecht, Netherlands

4. Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands

5. Department of Sports Medicine, Royal Netherlands Army, Utrecht, Netherlands

6. Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, United States

7. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

8. Trauma Research Unit, Department of Trauma Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractThe diagnosis chronic exertional compartment syndrome is traditionally linked to elevated intracompartmental pressures, although uncertainty regarding this diagnostic instrument is increasing. The aim of current review was to evaluate literature for alternative diagnostic tests. A search in line with PRISMA criteria was conducted. Studies evaluating diagnostic tests for chronic exertional compartment syndrome other than intracompartmental pressure measurements were included. Bias and quality of studies were evaluated using the Oxford Levels of Evidence and the QUADAS-2 instrument. A total of 28 studies met study criteria (MRI n=8, SPECT n=6, NIRS n=4, MRI and NIRS together n=1, miscellaneous modalities n=9). Promising results were reported for MRI (n=4), NIRS (n=4) and SPECT (n=3). These imaging techniques rely on detecting changes of signal intensity in manually selected regions of interest in the muscle compartments of the leg. Yet, diagnostic tools and protocols were diverse. Moreover, five studies explored alternative modalities serving as an adjunct, rather than replacing pressure measurements. Future research is warranted as clinical and methodological heterogeneity were present and high quality validation studies were absent. Further optimization of specific key criteria based on a patient’s history, physical examination and symptom provocation may potentially render intracompartmental pressure measurement redundant.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3