Early prediction of post-ERCP pancreatitis by post-procedure amylase and lipase levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Goyal Hemant12,Sachdeva Sonali3,Sherazi Syed Ali Amir4,Gupta Shweta4,Perisetti Abhilash5,Ali Aman6,Chandan Saurabh7,Tharian Benjamin8,Sharma Neil5,Thosani Nirav9

Affiliation:

1. University of Texas at Houston, McGovern School of Medicine, Texas, United States

2. Mercer University School of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Macon, Georgia, United States

3. Boston University Medical Center, Medicine, Boston, Masschusetts, United States

4. John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States

5. Parkview Health System, Advanced Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

6. Wilkes-Barre General Hospital, Endoscopy, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States

7. CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Omaha, Nebraska, United States

8. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Medicin, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

9. University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Houston, Texas, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication attributed to the procedure, its incidence being approximately 9.7 %. Numerous studies have evaluated the predictive efficacy of post-procedure serum amylase and lipase levels but with varied procedure-to-test time intervals and cut-off values. The aim of this meta-analysis was to present pooled data from available studies to compare the predictive accuracies of serum amylase and lipase for PEP. Patients and methods A total of 18 studies were identified after a comprehensive search of various databases until June 2021 that reported the use of pancreatic enzymes for PEP. Results The sample size consisted of 11,790 ERCPs, of which PEP occurred in 764 (6.48 %). Subgroups for serum lipase and amylase were created based on the cut-off used for diagnosing PEP, and meta-analysis was done for each subgroup. Results showed that serum lipase more than three to four times the upper limit of normal (ULN) performed within 2 to 4 hours of ERCP had the highest pooled sensitivity (92 %) for PEP. Amylase level more than five to six times the ULN was the most specific serum marker with a pooled specificity of 93 %. Conclusions Our analysis indicates that a lipase level less than three times the ULN within 2 to 4 hours of ERCP can be used as a good predictor to rule out PEP when used as an adjunct to patient clinical presentation. Multicenter randomized controlled trials using lipase and amylase are warranted to further evaluate their PEP predictive accuracy, especially in high-risk patients.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3