HoloDIEP—Faster and More Accurate Intraoperative DIEA Perforator Mapping Using a Novel Mixed Reality Tool

Author:

Necker Fabian N.ORCID,Cholok David J.1ORCID,Fischer Marc J.2,Shaheen Mohammed S.1,Gifford Kyle3ORCID,Januszyk Michael1ORCID,Leuze Christoph W.2ORCID,Scholz Michael4ORCID,Daniel Bruce L.2ORCID,Momeni Arash1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

2. Department of Radiology, Stanford IMMERS (Incubator for Medical Mixed and Extended Reality at Stanford), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

3. Department of Radiology, 3D and Quantitative Imaging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

4. Digital Anatomy Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Functional and Clinical Anatomy, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Microsurgical breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue is a complex procedure, in part, due to variable vascular/perforator anatomy. Preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) has mitigated this challenge to some degree; yet it continues to pose certain challenges. The ability to map perforators with Mixed Reality has been demonstrated in case studies, but its accuracy has not been studied intraoperatively. Here, we compare the accuracy of “HoloDIEP” in identifying perforator location (vs. Doppler ultrasound) by using holographic 3D models derived from preoperative CTA. Methods Using a custom application on HoloLens, the deep inferior epigastric artery vascular tree was traced in 15 patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction. Perforator markings were compared against the 3D model in a coordinate system centered on the umbilicus. Holographic- and Doppler-identified markings were compared using a perspective-corrected photo technique against the 3D model along with measurement of duration of perforator mapping for each technique. Results Vascular points in HoloDIEP skin markings were −0.97 ± 6.2 mm (perforators: −0.62 ± 6.13 mm) away from 3D-model ground-truth in radial length from the umbilicus at a true distance of 10.81 ± 6.14 mm (perforators: 11.40 ± 6.15 mm). Absolute difference in radial distance was twice as high for Doppler markings compared with Holo-markings (9.71 ± 6.16 and 4.02 ± 3.20 mm, respectively). Only in half of all cases (7/14), more than 50% of the Doppler-identified points were reasonably close (<30 mm) to 3D-model ground-truth. HoloDIEP was twice as fast as Doppler ultrasound (76.9s vs. 150.4 s per abdomen). Conclusion HoloDIEP allows for faster and more accurate intraoperative perforator mapping than Doppler ultrasound.

Funder

F. Necker and Dr. M. Scholz

BaCaTeC - Bavaria California Technology Center, Erlangen, Germany

State of Bavaria, Bavarian State Ministry for Science and Art

Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation - bidt (Munich

Bavarian State Ministry for Science and Art

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3