Comparison of Anterior versus Posterior Fixation in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Subluxation in Terms of Intraoperative Blood Loss, Surgical Time, and Length of Hospital Stay: A Prospective Observational Study

Author:

Shabbir Muhammad Asif1,Ikram Shuja1,Khizar Ahtesham1ORCID,Elahi Inaam1,Ghafoor Abdul1,Umer Muhammad Waqas1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior versus posterior fixation for traumatic subaxial cervical spine subluxation in terms of mean intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay. Materials and Methods A prospective observational study was conducted from August 25, 2022 to August 24, 2023 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan, including 60 patients (30 in each group) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Group A had anterior cervical fixation, while group B underwent posterior cervical fixation. Patients were monitored for intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay. All the results were collected and recorded on a proforma. Results The mean age of the patients in group A was 45.40 ± 3.75 years and that in group B was 45.50 ± 4.13 years. In all, 48.8% (n = 21) were males and 52.9% (n = 9) were females in group A, while 51.2% (n = 22) were males and 47.1% (n = 8) were females in group B. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 71.60 ± 0.77 mL in group A and 101.76 ± 0.85 mL in group B. The mean surgical time was 72.73 ± 0.98 minutes in group A and 94.73 ± 0.58 minutes in group B. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.63 ± 0.55 days in group A and 12.80 ± 0.71 days in group B. Conclusion It was concluded that the anterior approach is better than the posterior approach for traumatic subaxial cervical subluxation spine in terms of low blood loss, less surgical time, and reduced hospital stay.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3