Response to Lithium in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: What are Psychiatrists’ Experiences and Practices Compared to Literature Review?

Author:

Montlahuc Claire12,Curis Emmanuel134,Grillault Laroche Diane35,Bagoe Gérald1,Etain Bruno356,Bellivier Frank356,Chevret Sylvie12

Affiliation:

1. Service de Biostatistique et Information médicale, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France

2. ECSTRA Team (Épidémiologie Clinique et Statistiques pour la Recherche en Santé), UMR 1153 INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France

3. UMR-S 1144, INSERM, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, F-75013, France

4. Laboratoire de Biomathématiques, Plateau iB², Faculté de Pharmacie de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France

5. AP-HP, GH Saint-Louis – Lariboisière – F. Widal, Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France

6. Fondation FondaMental, CHU de Créteil, Créteil, France

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aims at characterizing French psychiatrists’ opinions regarding definition criteria and factors associated with lithium prophylactic response in patients with bipolar disorders. Methods After a literature review, an online survey targeted French psychiatrists in 2016. Results Literature review showed inconsistencies in reported definition criteria and clinical predictors of lithium prophylactic response. A total of 104 psychiatrists, mostly working in hospitals, completed the survey. The inconsistencies regarding definition criteria and predictors of lithium response were confirmed. Five factors were commonly reported by psychiatrists as positively associated with successful response (family history of lithium response and of bipolar I disorder, and lithium efficacy in acute mood phases treatment) or with an unsuccessful response (rapid cycling and alcohol misuse). Discussion The divergence in psychiatrists’ opinions surely plays a major role in the variability of lithium prescriptions among psychiatrists. Currently, the large variations in response definitions, and in study designs used to quantify each factor’s effect, preclude synthesizing the findings. A standardization of response measures is needed to explore factors that influence the prophylactic lithium efficacy.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3