Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section Analysis and Factors Associated with Discordance of Final Histopathology in Mucinous Ovarian Tumor

Author:

Gupta Rubi1,Patel Bijal1,Dave Pariseema1,Arora Ruchi1,Parekh Chetna1,Dama Swetha1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Abstract

Aim and Objective This article determines the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section (FS) in case of mucinous ovarian tumor (MOT) and tailoring of intraoperative treatment decision. Material and Methods This was an observational study in which retrospective data was analyzed prospectively from January 2008 to December 2015 at the Regional Cancer Center. This study included 158 patients with MOT who underwent FS analysis during staging laparotomy at our institute. FS's sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated and compared with final paraffin histopathological examination (HPE). Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to decide factors associated with changes in final HPE. Results FS analysis and final HPE report were concordant in 77.8% (123/158) of the cases and discordant in 22.1% (35/158). Out of 35 discordant cases, 29 (18.3%) were upgraded and 06 (5.6%) were downgraded. Out of 33 borderline cases, 16 (48.4%) were upgraded to malignant MOT and 6 (18.1%) were downgraded to benign MOT on final HPE. Out of 40 malignant MOT, 40 (100%) showed malignancy on final HPE. In the case of benign MOT on FS, 13 out of 85 (15.2%) upgraded to borderline or malignant. Sensitivity and specificity of FS were 76.60 and 55.17%, respectively, for benign MOT, 55.17 and 86.96% for borderline MOT, and 86.96 and 100% for malignant MOT. Conclusion In MOT, due to its large size and heterogeneous nature, it displays spectrum of appearance ranging from benign cyst adenoma, and borderline tumor to adenocarcinoma. Our study showed significant discordance between FS and final histopathological diagnosis in borderline MOT.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3