Fetal Growth Biometry as Predictors of Shoulder Dystocia in a Low-Risk Obstetrical Population

Author:

Newman Roger B.1,Stevens Danielle R.2,Hunt Kelly J.2,Grobman William A.3,Owen John4,Sciscione Anthony5,Wapner Ronald J.6,Skupski Daniel7,Chien Edward K.8,Wing Deborah A.910,Ranzini Angela C.811,Porto Manuel9,Grantz Katherine L.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

2. Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Health Care Center, Wilmington, Delaware

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, Metro Health Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine; Orange, California

10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fountain Valley Regional Hospital and Medical Center, Fountain Valley, California

11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey

12. Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate fetal biometrics as predictors of shoulder dystocia (SD) in a low-risk obstetrical population.Study Design Participants were enrolled as part of a U.S.-based prospective cohort study of fetal growth in low-risk singleton gestations (n = 2,802). Eligible women had liveborn singletons ≥2,500 g delivered vaginally. Sociodemographic, anthropometric, and pregnancy outcome data were abstracted by research staff. The diagnosis of SD was based on the recorded clinical impression of the delivering physician. Simple logistic regression models were used to examine associations between fetal biometrics and SD. Fetal biometric cut points, selected by Youden's J and clinical determination, were identified to optimize predictive capability. A final model for SD prediction was constructed using backward selection. Our dataset was randomly divided into training (60%) and test (40%) datasets for model building and internal validation.Results A total of 1,691 women (98.7%) had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, while 23 (1.3%) experienced SD. There were no differences in sociodemographic or maternal anthropometrics between groups. Epidural anesthesia use was significantly more common (100 vs. 82.4%; p = 0.03) among women who experienced SD compared with those who did not. Amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket was also significantly greater among SD cases (5.8 ± 1.7 vs. 5.1 ± 1.5 cm; odds ratio = 1.32 [95% confidence interval: 1.03,1.69]). Several fetal biometric measures were significantly associated with SD when dichotomized based on clinically selected cut-off points. A final prediction model was internally valid with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.99). At a model probability of 1%, sensitivity (71.4%), specificity (77.5%), positive (3.5%), and negative predictive values (99.6%) did not indicate the ability of the model to predict SD in a clinically meaningful way.Conclusion Other than epidural anesthesia use, neither sociodemographic nor maternal anthropometrics were significantly associated with SD in this low-risk population. Both individually and in combination, fetal biometrics had limited ability to predict SD and lack clinical usefulness.Key Points

Funder

Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health including ARRA funding.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference39 articles.

1. Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare;R B Gherman;Clin Obstet Gynecol,2002

2. Shoulder dystocia: a fetal-physician risk;T L Gross;Am J Obstet Gynecol,1987

3. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia;D B Acker;Obstet Gynecol,1985

4. Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California;T S Nesbitt;Am J Obstet Gynecol,1998

5. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review;S P Chauhan;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3