Implementation Fidelity of Chatbot Screening for Social Needs: Acceptability, Feasibility, Appropriateness

Author:

Langevin Raina1,Berry Andrew B. L.2,Zhang Jinyang3,Fockele Callan E.4,Anderson Layla4,Hsieh Dennis5,Hartzler Andrea6,Duber Herbert C.47,Hsieh Gary1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

2. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States

3. Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States

5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California, United States

6. Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

7. Office of Health and Science, Washington State Department of Health, Seattle, Washington, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Patient and provider-facing screening tools for social determinants of health have been explored in a variety of contexts; however, effective screening and resource referral remain challenging, and less is known about how patients perceive chatbots as potential social needs screening tools. We investigated patient perceptions of a chatbot for social needs screening using three implementation outcome measures: acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness. Methods We implemented a chatbot for social needs screening at one large public hospital emergency department (ED) and used concurrent triangulation to assess perceptions of the chatbot use for screening. A total of 350 ED visitors completed the social needs screening and rated the chatbot on implementation outcome measures, and 22 participants engaged in follow-up phone interviews. Results The screened participants ranged in age from 18 to 90 years old and were diverse in race/ethnicity, education, and insurance status. Participants (n = 350) rated the chatbot as an acceptable, feasible, and appropriate way of screening. Through interviews (n = 22), participants explained that the chatbot was a responsive, private, easy to use, efficient, and comfortable channel to report social needs in the ED, but wanted more information on data use and more support in accessing resources. Conclusion In this study, we deployed a chatbot for social needs screening in a real-world context and found patients perceived the chatbot to be an acceptable, feasible, and appropriate modality for social needs screening. Findings suggest that chatbots are a promising modality for social needs screening and can successfully engage a large, diverse patient population in the ED. This is significant, as it suggests that chatbots could facilitate a screening process that ultimately connects patients to care for social needs, improving health and well-being for members of vulnerable patient populations.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference68 articles.

1. Social determinants of health inequalities;M Marmot;Lancet,2005

2. A systematic review of interventions on patients' social and economic needs;L M Gottlieb;Am J Prev Med,2017

3. Addressing social determinants of health and health inequalities;N E Adler;JAMA,2016

4. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health;M Marmot;Lancet,2008

5. Budget impact of a comprehensive nutrition-focused quality improvement program for malnourished hospitalized patients;S Sulo;Am Health Drug Benefits,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3