Medication Reconciliation during Transitions of Care Across Institutions: A Quantitative Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities

Author:

Araya Alejandro1,Thornton Logan R.2,Kwon Deukwoo3,Ferguson Gayla M.4,Highfield Linda D.456,Hwang Kevin O.7,Holmes Holly M.8,Bernstam Elmer V.17

Affiliation:

1. D. Bradley McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth), Houston, Texas, United States

2. Division of Population Health and Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Transformation Initiatives, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States

3. Division of Clinical and Translation Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States

4. Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States

5. Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States

6. Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States

7. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States

8. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objective Medication discrepancies between clinical systems may pose a patient safety hazard. In this paper, we identify challenges and quantify medication discrepancies across transitions of care. Methods We used structured clinical data and free-text hospital discharge summaries to compare active medications' lists at four time points: preadmission (outpatient), at-admission (inpatient), at-discharge (inpatient), and postdischarge (outpatient). Medication lists were normalized to RxNorm. RxNorm identifiers were further processed using the RxNav API to identify the ingredient. The specific drugs and ingredients from inpatient and outpatient medication lists were compared. Results Using RxNorm drugs, the median percentage intersection when comparing active medication lists within the same electronic health record system ranged between 94.1 and 100% indicating substantial overlap. Similarly, when using RxNorm ingredients the median percentage intersection was 94.1 to 100%. In contrast, the median percentage intersection when comparing active medication lists across EHR systems was significantly lower (RxNorm drugs: 6.1–7.1%; RxNorm ingredients: 29.4–35.0%) indicating that the active medication lists were significantly less similar (p < 0.05).Medication lists in the same EHR system are more similar to each other (fewer discrepancies) than medication lists in different EHR systems when comparing specific RxNorm drug and the more general RxNorm ingredients at transitions of care. Transitions of care that require interoperability between two EHR systems are associated with more discrepancies than transitions where medication changes are expected (e.g., at-admission vs. at-discharge). Challenges included lack of access to structured, standardized medication data across systems, and difficulty distinguishing medications from orderable supplies such as lancets and diabetic test strips. Conclusion Despite the challenges to medication normalization, there are opportunities to identify and assist with medication reconciliation across transitions of care between institutions.

Funder

National Institutes of Health/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Blue Cross Blue Shield and the Cullen Trust for Healthcare

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3