Assessing Equitable Recruitment in a Digital Health Trial for Asthma

Author:

Plombon Savanna1,S. Rudin Robert2,Sulca Flores Jorge1,Goolkasian Gillian1,Sousa Jessica2,Rodriguez Jorge13,Lipsitz Stuart13,Foer Dinah345,K. Dalal Anuj13

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

2. Healthcare Division, RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

5. Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to assess a multipronged strategy using primarily digital methods to equitably recruit asthma patients into a clinical trial of a digital health intervention. Methods We approached eligible patients using at least one of eight recruitment strategies. We recorded approach dates and the strategy that led to completion of a web-based eligibility questionnaire that was reported during the verbal consent phone call. Study team members conducted monthly sessions using a structured guide to identify recruitment barriers and facilitators. The proportion of participants who reported being recruited by a portal or nonportal strategy was measured as our outcomes. We used Fisher's exact test to compare outcomes by equity variable, and multivariable logistic regression to control for each covariate and adjust effect size estimates. Using grounded theory, we coded and extracted themes regarding recruitment barriers and facilitators. Results The majority (84.4%) of patients who met study inclusion criteria were patient portal enrollees. Of 6,366 eligible patients who were approached, 627 completed the eligibility questionnaire and were less frequently Hispanic, less frequently Spanish-speaking, and more frequently patient portal enrollees. Of 445 patients who consented to participate, 241 (54.2%) reported completing the eligibility questionnaire after being contacted by a patient portal message. In adjusted analysis, only race (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.77, p = 0.003) and college education (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39–0.91, p = 0.016) remained significant. Key recruitment barriers included technology issues (e.g., lack of email access) and facilitators included bilingual study staff, Spanish-language recruitment materials, targeted phone calls, and clinician-initiated “1-click” referrals. Conclusion A primarily digital strategy to recruit patients into a digital health trial is unlikely to achieve equitable participation, even in a population overrepresented by patient portal enrollees. Nondigital recruitment methods that address racial and educational disparities and less active portal enrollees are necessary to ensure equity in clinical trial enrollment.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Health disparities in allergic diseases;Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology;2024-01-31

2. Entwicklungen in der Digitalisierung von Public Health seit 2020;Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz;2024-01-10

3. Effectiveness of a Vendor Predictive Model for the Risk of Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis;Applied Clinical Informatics;2023-09-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3