Cycled Lighting Versus Continuous Near Darkness in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Arayici Sema1,Simsek Gulsum Kadioglu2,Uras Nurdan3,Oncel Mehmet Yekta4,Canpolat Fuat Emre2,Oguz Serife Suna2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

2. Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.

3. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.

4. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, İzmir, Turkey.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the effectiveness of cycled lighting (CL) or continuous near darkness (CND) on weight in preterm infants. Study Design Total 147 infants with a gestational age 25–32 weeks and/or a birth weight 750–1500 g were included in the study. The infants were classified into two groups: CL and CND. Weight on postnatal day 14, weight at corrected 35 weeks, mean rectal temperature and serum growth hormone, cortisol, melatonin levels at 35 weeks’ post menstrual age (PMA), weekly weight gain, full enteral feeding time, duration of mechanical ventilation, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), length of stay in the hospital, weight and length at three and six months corrected age were compared between the groups. Results There were no differences between weights on postnatal day 14. Anthropometric parameters and mean rectal temperatures of groups also were not different at 35 weeks’ PMA. There were no differences among the groups in duration of full enteral feeding time, length of stay in hospitalization, duration of mechanical ventilation, ROP and anthropometric parameters. Further, serum growth hormone, cortisol, and melatonin levels were similar between the groups at 35 weeks’ PMA. Conclusion CL and CND did not have any advantages over each other.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3