Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in High-Risk Patients: Success versus Risk

Author:

Niemann Bernd1,Doll Nicolas2,Grubitzsch Herko3,Hanke Thorsten4,Knaut Michael5,Senges Jochen6,Ouarrak Taoufik6,Vondran Maximilian7,Böning Andreas8

Affiliation:

1. Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, UKGM - Klinik für Herz-, Kinderherz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Giessen, Hessen, Germany

2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Schüchtermann-Klinik Bad Rothenfelde, Bad Rothenfelde, Niedersachsen, Germany

3. Charite Medical Faculty Berlin, Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

4. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Hamburg, Germany

5. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany

6. Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany

7. Department for Cardiac Surgery, Karlsburg Hospital, Karlsburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

8. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Surgical atrial ablation is evaluated by surgeons in relation to the estimated surgical risk. We analyze whether high-risk patients (HRPs) experience risk escalation by ablation procedures. Methods The CASE-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) registry is a prospective, multicenter, all-comers registry of atrial ablation in cardiac surgery. We analyzed the 1-year outcome regarding survival and rhythm endpoints of 1,000 consecutive patients according to the operative risk classification (EuroSCORE II ≤ 2 vs. >2). Results Higher NYHA (New York Heart Association) score, ischemic heart failure, status poststroke, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus were strongly represented in HRPs. HRPs exhibit more left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (19.2 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.001) but identical left atrial diameter and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter compared with low-risk patients (LRPs). CHA2DS-Vasc-score (2.4 ± 1 vs. 3.6 ± 1.5; p < 0.001), sternotomies, combination surgeries, coronary artery bypass graft, and mitral valve procedures were increased in HRPs. LRPs underwent stand-alone ablations as well. Ablation energy did not differ. Left atrial appendage closure was performed in up to 86.1% (mainly cut-and-sew procedures). Mortality corresponded to the original risk class without an escalation that may be related to ablation, stroke rate, or myocardial infarction. A total of 60.6% of HRPs versus 75.1% of LRPs were discharged in sinus rhythm. Long-term EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association) score symptoms were lower in HRPs. Repeated rhythm therapies were rare. Additional antiarrhythmics received a minority without group dependency. A total of 1.6 versus 4.1% of HRPs (p = 0.042) underwent long-term stroke; excess mortality was not observed. Anticoagulation remained common in HRPs. Conclusion Surgical risk and long-term mortality are determined by the underlying disease. In HRPs, freedom from AF and symptom relief can be achieved. Preoperative risk scores should not lead to withholding an ablation procedure.

Funder

AtriCure Europe

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3