Evaluation of the “Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment” to Predict Mortality in Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Preterm Infants

Author:

Kraja Elvis1,Demirtas Ferhan1ORCID,Kostekci Yasemin Ezgi1ORCID,Turker Nazmiye2,Okulu Emel3,Erdeve Ömer1,Atasay Begum1,Arsan Saadet1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

2. Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

3. Division of Neonatology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Abstract Introduction We aimed to evaluate the use of “Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment” (nSOFA) scoring in predicting mortality, to compare the accuracy of nSOFA scores at different time points in very preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS), and to investigate other possible parameters that would improve the prediction. Methods This single-center, retrospective study included preterm infants born atS<32 weeks’ gestation with culture-proven LOS. The nSOFA scores of non-fatal and fatal episodes were compared at nine time points. Results Of 120 culture-proven LOS episodes in 106 infants, 90 (75%) episodes were non-fatal and 30 (25%) episodes were fatal. The mean birth weight (BW) of the infants who died was lower than that of survivors (p=0.038). In the fatal LOS episodes, median nSOFA scores were higher at all time points measured before sepsis evaluation, at the time of evaluation, and at all time points measured after the evaluation (p<0.001). nSOFA scores before death and at 48 hours were higher in the fatal episodes (p<0.001). At the time of sepsis assessment, nSOFA score>4 was associated with a 7- to 16-fold increased risk of mortality. Adjustment for BW, lymphocyte and monocyte counts increased the risk to 9- to 18-fold. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the use of nSOFA to predict mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants seems feasible. The scoring system could be improved by evaluating the other parameters.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3