Determination of Anatomical Levels in Spina Bifida Fetuses with Ultrasound and MRI

Author:

Vonzun Ladina12ORCID,Kahr Maike Katja1,Wille David34,Kottke Raimund54,Moehrlen Ueli624,Meuli Martin624,Ochsenbein-Kölble Nicole12,Kraehenmann Franziska12,Zimmermann Roland12,Mazzone Luca624

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland

2. The Zurich Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy (www.swissfetus.ch), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

3. Department of Pediatric Neurology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

4. Spina Bifida Center, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

5. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

6. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of prenatal anatomical level determination by ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by analyzing the congruence with the “true” anatomical level identified by postnatal MRI. Patients and Methods The first 60 patients undergoing fetal myelomeningocele surgery at The Zurich Center for Fetal Diangosis and Therapy were included in this study. Anatomical levels (i. e., first dysraphic vertebra) determined by prenatal US and MRI were compared to postnatal MRI. The level of agreement between the imaging modalities was evaluated with a Cohen’s kappa test. Results > 0.6 were interpreted as good agreement, > 0.8 as excellent. Results The exact congruence between prenatal US and MRI compared to postnatal MRI was 33 % and 48 %, respectively, for an accuracy within one level difference of 80 % and 90 %, and within two levels difference of 95 % and 98 %, respectively. The level of agreement of prenatal US and MRI compared to postnatal MRI was 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Most of the prenatally incorrectly assigned levels were assigned too high (worse) than the “true” level (US 88 % vs. MRI 65 %). Conclusion Reliable exact prenatal level determination by US and MRI is not possible. However, the prenatal determination of the anatomical level of the lesion is good within one level margin of error. Prenatal US as well as MRI demonstrate a systematic error towards higher levels. The above considerations must be integrated into prenatal counselling.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference13 articles.

1. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele;N S Adzick;N Engl J Med,2011

2. Benchmarking against the MOMS Trial: Zurich Results of Open Fetal Surgery for Spina Bifida;U Mohrlen;Fetal Diagn Ther,2019

3. Over the cutting edge: how ethics consultation illuminates the moral complexity of open-uterine fetal repair of spina bifida and patients’ decision making;M J Bliton;J Clin Ethics,2001

4. Prenatal diagnosis and patient preferences in patients with neural tube defects around the advent of fetal surgery in Belgium and Holland;C Ovaere;Fetal Diagn Ther,2015

5. Upper level of the spina bifida defect: how good are we?;J P Bruner;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2004

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3