Fetal Assessment in Pregnancy (Indication and Methodology for Fetal Monitoring in a Low-risk Population). Guideline of the DGGG, DEGUM, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/089, February 2023)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Fetal Assessment in Pregnancy (Indication and Methodology for Fetal Monitoring in a Low-risk Population). Guideline of the DGGG, DEGUM, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/089, February 2023)

Published:2023-08 Issue:08 Volume:83 Page:996-1016
ISSN:0016-5751
Container-title:Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
language:de
Short-container-title:Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd

Author:

Schiermeier Sven¹,von Kaisenberg Constantin Sylvius²,Kehl Sven³,Reister Frank⁴,Mosimann Beatrice⁵,Reif Philipp⁶,Harlfinger Werner⁷,König Klaus⁸,Schwarz Christiane⁹,Matern Elke¹⁰,Kühnert Maritta¹¹,Schmitz Ralf¹²,Hoopmann Markus¹³,Ramsell Andrea¹⁴,Kalberer Barbara Stocker¹⁵,Heule Petra Graf¹⁵,Heinzl Silke¹⁶,Kayer Beate¹⁶,Gruber Patricia¹⁴,Steiner Horst¹⁷,Schaeffer Leonard¹⁸

Affiliation:

1. Lehrstuhl für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Marien-Hospital Witten, Witten, Germany

2. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Hannover (MHH), Hannover, Germany

3. Gynecology & Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

4. Sektion Geburtshilfe, Univ.-Frauenklinik, Univ.-Klinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany

5. University Womenʼs Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland

6. Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

7. Frauenarztpraxis, Mainz, Germany

8. Berufsverband der Frauenärzte, Eschborn, Germany

9. Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery Science, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

10. Medical Department, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

11. Geburtshilfe, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany

12. Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany

13. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

14. Deutscher Hebammenverband e. V., Karlsruhe, Germany

15. Schweizerischer Hebammenverband, Olten, Switzerland

16. Österreichisches Hebammengremium, Wien, Austria

17. Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Paracelsus, Salzburg, Austria

18. Kantonsspital Baden AG, Baden, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The aim of this guideline was to find evidence on whether carrying out Doppler examinations and CTGs in low-risk cohorts of pregnant women improves outcomes. Methods First, a systematic search for guidelines was carried out. Identified guidelines were evaluated using the DELPHI instrument of the AWMF. Three guidelines were found to be suitable to evaluate CTG. Two DEGUM best practice guidelines were judged suitable to describe the methods. All studies on this issue were additionally analyzed using 8 PICO questions. A structured consensus of the participating professional societies was achieved using a nominal group process and a structured consensus conference moderated by an independent moderator. Recommendations No antepartum Doppler sonography examinations should be carried out in low-risk cohorts in the context of antenatal care. No antepartum CTG should be carried out in low-risk cohorts. Note The guideline will be published simultaneously in the official journals of both professional societies (i.e., Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde for the DGGG and Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound for the DEGUM).

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Link

http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2096-1182.pdf

Reference24 articles.

1. Qualitätsanforderungen an die weiterführende differenzierte Ultraschalluntersuchung in der pränatalen Diagnostik (DEGUM-Stufen II und III) im Zeitraum 11–13 + 6 Schwangerschaftswochen [Quality Requirements for the early Fetal Ultrasound Assessment at 11–13 + 6 Weeks of Gestation (DEGUM Levels II and III)];C Von Kaisenberg;Ultraschall Med,2016

2. Empfehlungen der DEGUM, der ÖGUM, der SGUM und der FMF Deutschland zum Einsatz von Ersttrimester-Screening, früher Fehlbildungsdiagnostik, Screening an zellfreier DNA (NIPT) und diagnostischen Punktionen [DEGUM, ÖGUM, SGUM and FMF Germany Recommendations for the Implementation of First-Trimester Screening, Detailed Ultrasound, Cell-Free DNA Screening and Diagnostic Procedures];P Kozlowski;Ultraschall Med,2019

3. Aktualisierte Qualitätsanforderungen an die Ultraschall-Screeninguntersuchung in der pränatalen Basisdiagnostik (= DEGUM-Stufe I) im Zeitraum 18 + 0 bis 21 + 6 Schwangerschaftswochen [Updated DEGUM Quality Requirements for the Basic Prenatal Screening Ultrasound Examination (DEGUM Level I) between 18 + 0 and 21 + 6 weeks of gestation];C Kähler;Ultraschall Med,2020

4. Aktualisierte Qualitätsanforderungen an die weiterführende differenzierte Ultraschalluntersuchung in der pränatalen Diagnostik (= DEGUM-Stufe II) im Zeitraum von 18 + 0 bis 21 + 6 Schwangerschaftswochen [Updated quality requirements regarding secondary differentiated ultrasound examination in prenatal diagnostics (= DEGUM level II) in the period from 18 + 0 to 21 + 6 weeks of gestation];E Merz;Ultraschall Med,2012

5. Qualitätsanforderungen der DEGUM zur Durchführung der fetalen Echokardiografie [Quality standards of the DEGUM for performance of fetal echocardiography];R Chaoui;Ultraschall Med,2008