The Development of a Universally Accepted Sacral Fracture Classification: A Survey of AOSpine and AOTrauma Members

Author:

Schroeder Gregory D.1,Kurd Mark F.1,Kepler Christopher K.1,Krieg James C.1,Wilson Jefferson R.2,Kleweno Conor P.3,Firoozabadi Reza3,Bellabarba Carlo3,Kandizoria Frank4,Schnake Klause J.5,Rajesekaran S.6,Dvorak Marcel F.7,Chapman Jens R.8,Vialle Luiz R.9,Oner F. C.10,Vaccaro Alexander R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

4. Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

5. Schön Klinik Nürnberg Fürth, Center for Spinal Surgery, Fürth, Germany

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States

9. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catholic University, Curitiba, Brazil

10. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Study Design Survey study. Objective To determine the global perspective on controversial aspects of sacral fracture classifications. Methods While developing the AOSpine Sacral Injury Classification System, a survey was sent to all members of AOSpine and AOTrauma. The survey asked four yes-or-no questions to help determine the best way to handle controversial aspects of sacral fractures in future classifications. Chi-square tests were initially used to compare surgeons’ answers to the four key questions of the survey, and then the data was modeled through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 474 surgeons answered all questions in the survey. Overall 86.9% of respondents felt that the proposed hierarchical nature of injuries was appropriate, and 77.8% of respondents agreed that that the risk of neurologic injury is highest in a vertical fracture through the foramen. Almost 80% of respondents felt that the separation of injuries based on the integrity of L5–S1 facet was appropriate, and 83.8% of surgeons agreed that a nondisplaced sacral U fracture is a clinically relevant entity. Conclusion This study determines the global perspective on controversial areas in the injury patterns of sacral fractures and demonstrates that the development of a comprehensive and universally accepted sacral classification is possible.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3